Our verdict

With its luxurious nubuck leather and hard-wearing components, the 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX screams Italian quality! And we were elated to discover that this visually appealing Zamberlan boot is equally impressive on the trail. It ticks all the boxes for backpacking while keeping the weight as light as possible. It treated our feet to an accommodating fit without a break-in period and made us feel primed for a multi-day adventure.

Pros

  • Excellent support and stability
  • Great impact protection for long hikes
  • Cozy in-shoe experience
  • Light for a backpacking boot
  • Effective waterproofing
  • Roomy toebox
  • Highly durable materials
  • Solid grip on varied terrain
  • Clean retro look

Cons

  • Not for very soft and technical terrain
  • Expensive
  • Gets much stiffer in cold weather

Audience verdict

89
Great!

Who should buy

We believe that the Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX is worth your attention if:

  • you prefer Italian boots with all-leather uppers (especially when produced with a high-end and eco-friendly artisanal tanning)
  • you prioritize comfortable backpacking boots without a painful break-in period
  • you are willing to invest in a long-lasting pair of boots
  • you can't get enough of its retro mountaineering boot aesthetics

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX review

Who should NOT buy

The overall style and material choices dictate the boot's high asking price. But if all you care about is performance and durability, there are considerably cheaper alternatives that get the job done on challenging terrain.

We highly recommend the Salomon Quest 4 GTX and the Salewa Alp Trainer 2 Mid GTX among other tried-and-true backpacking boots.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX lab test

Cushioning

Heel stack

We experienced a solid amount of impact protection and isolation from trail in the Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX.

With a heel stack of 34.9 mm, the boot packs enough underfoot material to keep the foot guarded on both day hiker and multi-day adventures.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Heel stack
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 34.9 mm
Average 36.3 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
26.2 mm
Heel stack
46.9 mm

Forefoot stack

The boot turned out to be equally protective in the ball of foot area. Our caliper measured an above-average forefoot stack height of 23.7 mm which is a great buffer against rocks, roots, and other debris.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Forefoot stack
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 23.7 mm
Average 22.9 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
17.0 mm
Forefoot stack
31.0 mm

Drop

We are pleased to see a moderate heel-to toe drop of 11.2 mm in this Zamberlan boot. It should sit well with most hikers, both beginner and seasoned.

The offset is neither too high to cause foot sliding nor too low to put pressure on the Achilles and calves.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Drop
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 11.2 mm
Average 13.4 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
0.6 mm
Drop
21.0 mm

Midsole softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

Despite its very comfortable step-in feel, the 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX is not a plush boot. Its midsole generates a lot of support and stability through a rather firm EVA midsole.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Midsole softness

Using a Shore A durometer, we measured its firmness at 47.4 HA which is 70%(!) denser than the average cushioning foam of a hiking boot.

It doesn't feel completetly unforgiving but if you prefer a softer underfoot experience, try the Lowa Renegade GTX Mid (25.6 HA) or the plush Hoka Kaha 2 GTX (21.7 HA).

Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 47.4 HA
Average 28.6 HA
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
14.7 HA
Midsole softness (soft to firm)
53.3 HA

Secondary foam softness

Note: a low durometer measurement equals a soft material, whereas a high measurement means it's firm.

We also discovered a stiff full-length plastic shank on top of the boot's already firm EVA foam. With a whopping durometer reading of 98.5 HA, it appears to be responsible for most of the boot's rigidity (more on that in the Stability section).

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Secondary foam softness

Midsole softness in cold (%)

On the bright side, you don't need to worry that the cushioning of this Zamberlan boot will freeze solid in cold weather. It is already as hard as it gets!

After keeping the boot in the freezer for 20 minutes, it showed a very moderate firmness change of 14%.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Midsole softness in cold (%)
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 14%
Average 20%
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
4%
Midsole softness in cold
50%

Insole thickness

The oot's cushioning setup is complemented by an adequately padded insole. We measured its thickness at a decent 4.9 mm in the heel.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Insole thickness
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 4.9 mm
Average 5.9 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
3.7 mm
Insole thickness
8.0 mm

Size and fit

Size

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX is true to size (26 votes).

Owners of this shoe, how does this shoe fit?

1 size small ½ size small True to size ½ size large 1 size large
Compared to 39 hiking boots
Number of shoes
½ size small
Slightly small
True to size
Slightly large
½ size large

Toebox width - widest part

According to Zamberlan, the 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX is built on a ZBPK backpacking performance last which offers "precise fit for technical hiking without compromising on comfort."

We can subscribe to that statement based on our own wear tests and lab measurements.

Having poured a gel mold of the boot's interiors, we were able to measure its toebox dimensions precisely with a caliper. Our tool recorded an above-average reading of 94.8 mm in the widest part of the mold (between the big toe and the pinkie).

This is indeed enough room to accommodate thicker socks and toe swelling on a longer hike without causing any dead space or looseness.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Toebox width - widest part
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 94.8 mm
Average 93.8 mm
Compared to 20 hiking boots
Number of shoes
89.7 mm
Toebox width - widest part
98.8 mm

Toebox width - big toe

We also found that the boot's toebox has a moderately rounded shape and a standard width of 70.5 mm near the big toe. It is not pointy or restricting for a D medium width.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Toebox width - big toe
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 70.5 mm
Average 71.3 mm
Compared to 20 hiking boots
Number of shoes
64.5 mm
Toebox width - big toe
80.9 mm

Toebox height

The risk of getting black toenails is also minimal in this boot thanks to its adequate toebox height of 26.8 mm.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Toebox height
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 26.8 mm
Average 27.5 mm
Compared to 20 hiking boots
Number of shoes
22.7 mm
Toebox height
33.5 mm

Stability

Lateral stability test

Side-to-side stability is a top priority for this Itallian boot.

We found that its sturdy built is capable of keeping the foot steady during high-mileage backpacking objectives and never felt at risk of ankle rolls. Even when tackling hilly terrain with lots of ascending, descending, and off-camber sections.

Torsional rigidity

The primary source of stability in the 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX is, of course, its ultra-stiff midsole that just does not let the foot buckle!

We could feel a ton of resistance coming from the boot's dense components as we attempted to twist it in our manual test. Because of that, we gave its torsional rigidity a maximum score of 5/5 without hesitation.

Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 5
Average 4.4
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Torsional rigidity
5

Heel counter stiffness

Zamberlan also grants a very secure heel hold in the 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX which is reflected in its stiff and structured heel counter. Because we could barely squeeze it in our manual test, the boot's heel counter got a high stiffness score of 4/5.

Our heels and ankles were treated to an ergonomic fit and comfortable padding which is in part what makes the boot's step-in feel so cozy.

Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 4
Average 3.6
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Heel counter stiffness
5

Midsole width - forefoot

Interestingly enough, the 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX provides all that surefootedness without packing a very wide platform. Measuring the widest part of its midsole in the forefoot, our caliper showed a moderate reading of 105.6 mm.

A narrower base makes this Zamberlan boot much lighter than a typical backpacking boot as well as more maneuverable on rocky and debris-laden trails.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Midsole width - forefoot
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 105.6 mm
Average 111.5 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
96.3 mm
Midsole width - forefoot
124.6 mm

Midsole width - heel

As we anticipated, the boot's heel also turned out to be significantly narrower than average at 79.9 mm. And yet, it wasn't critically slim to cause any wobbliness.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Midsole width - heel
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 79.9 mm
Average 87.5 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
71.7 mm
Midsole width - heel
106.1 mm

Flexibility / Stiffness

The boot's full-length pastic shank and firm EVA midsole become particularly apparent when you try to bend your foot in the 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX.

According to our force gauge, it takes 35% more effort to bend this Zamberlan to a 90-degree angle than it takes an average hiking boot.

This is neither good nor bad and depends on the hiker's personal preference. But the benefit of stiffer boots includes:

  • more even pressure distribution on ascents and descents
  • more efficient power transfer (especially when heavy load is involved)
  • less foot fatigue on longer hikes
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 67.0N
Average 44.3N
We use an average of four tests. The video shows one of those tests.
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
16.6N
Flexibility <> Stiffness
84.7N

Stiffness in cold (%)

Just when we thought that the boot couldn't get any stiffer, we found that its rigidity increased by another 32% after the freezer!

The force gauge reading went from 67.0N to 88.3N in 20 minutes making the boot one of the stiffest in our roster!

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Stiffness in cold (%)
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 32%
Average 24%
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
3%
Stiffness in cold
71%

Weight

Even though our scale showed 19.5 oz (553g), the Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX felt lighter on foot than its static weight suggested.

It may be heavier than average but we found that it is on the lighter side of backpacking boots. We loved the fact that it offers essential stability and sturdiness of a high-mileage boot but without all the extra bulk that normally comes with this type of footwear. Just a clean high-performance silhouette.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Weight
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 19.51 oz (553g)
Average 18.77 oz (532g)
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
11.71 oz (332g)
Weight
28.29 oz (802g)

Breathability

Breathability is limited in this Zamberlan boot for obvious reasons. It is an all-leather boot with a highly effective waterproofing membrane and no mesh or ventilation channels.

Having pumped smoke through its toebox, we didn't see a single streak passing anywhere through the seams or eyelets - the boot is 100% sealed. Thus, we rated its breathability with the lowest possible score - 1/5. Not recommended for summer.

Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 1
Average 1.3
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Breathability
5

Waterproofing

We are happy to report that the Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX is ready to brave the water element! Rain, puddles, shallow creeks, wet underbrush - none of it caused any leaks inside the boot!

With a Hydrobloc nubuck leather on the outside and a Gore-Tex Extended Comfort membrane on the inside, the boot offered maximum protection.

But if you expect extra wet conditions with a lot of water exposure, we highly recommend treating the boot's leather with a waterproof spray for added reinsurance.

Durability

Toebox durability

Even though it is so pleasantly soft and deicate to touch, the boot's tumbed nubuck leather shows impressive abrasion resistance! This is all thanks to the artisanal tanning process which allows combining the two features in one material.

To put the boot's nubuck through the test, we drilled the top of its toebox with sandpaper for 12 seconds at 5K RPM Dremel speed.

Considering that the tool merely brushed the topmost fluff off the leather, we confidently gave it the highest durability score of 5/5.

Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 5
Average 4.3
Compared to 37 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Toebox durability
5

Heel padding durability

Italian quality is woven into every little detail of this Zamberlan boot, even its inner collar lining! Covered in soft and smooth leather, it resisted our 4-second Dremel test brilliantly which earned the boot another high durability score - 5/5 for the heel padding.

Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 5
Average 3.6
Compared to 37 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1
Heel padding durability
5

Outsole hardness

Of course Zamberan had to partner with another acclaimed Italian brand Vibram to put a high-quality outsole on the 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX.

With an expectedly high reading of 85.0 HC, we have no concerns about the longevity of this rubber blend.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Outsole hardness
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 85.0 HC
Average 87.1 HC
We use an average of four tests. The photo shows one of those tests.
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
81.0 HC
Outsole hardness
92.1 HC

Outsole durability

Our demanding sandpaper test confirmed these high-set expectations as the Dremel did not get any deeper than 0.6 mm into the compound! That's a solid above-average result for a hiking boot.

Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 0.6 mm
Average 0.8 mm
Compared to 34 hiking boots
Number of shoes
0.0 mm
Outsole wear
2.0 mm

Outsole thickness

We were also satisfied with the boot's outsole thickness as it showed a caliper reading of 3.0 mm excluding lug depth. Adequately thick, hard, and wear-resistant, we expect a lot of life from the boot's Vibram outsole!

The fact that it is resolable also adds points to this Zamberlan boot.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Outsole thickness
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 3.0 mm
Average 3.0 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
1.8 mm
Outsole thickness
5.6 mm

Misc

Lug depth

The boot's Vibram Pillow outsole doesn't have the toothiest lugs. In fact, we measured their depth at only 3.3 mm which is notably shallower than average.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Lug depth

And yet, we were impressed at how the shape and spacing of these lugs resulted in a very grippy and surefooted experience. They inspired confidence on steep rock slabs, mossy logs, and greasy roots.

We were able to stomp through muddy puddles too and found the boot's outsole didn't hold on to the dirt. However, we would prefer deeper 5-6 mm lugs for squelching through peanut-butter mud.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX outsole

Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 3.3 mm
Average 4.3 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
3.0 mm
Lug depth
6.0 mm

Price

The 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX comes with a hefty price tag which is in part due to the high-end yet expensive artisanal tanning process used in the production of its nubuck eather. It is a more eco-friendly process which involves natural elements but is more difficult, rare, and costly.

But if you aren't specifically looking for that kind of leather tanning, you may find this Zamberlan boot rather overpriced. For the same MSRP, the market offers notably more reinforced and technical backpacking boots like the Asolo Fugitive GTX and the Salewa Mountain Trainer 2 Mid GTX. Both are flagship hiking and trekking boots which are ready for some serious outdoor action.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Price
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX $300
Average $209
Compared to 43 hiking boots
Number of shoes
$100
Price
$430

Reflective elements

There are no reflective elements on this Zamberlan boot.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Reflective elements
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX No

Tongue padding

A padded tongue contributes to the luxuriously comfortable interiors of the Trail Lite Evo GTX. We measured its thickness at a standard 10.2 mm.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Tongue padding
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX 10.3 mm
Average 11.2 mm
Compared to 41 hiking boots
Number of shoes
5.9 mm
Tongue padding
15.1 mm

Tongue: gusset type

The boot's upper is a one-piece construction where the tongue is inseparable from the rest of the boot. This makes the Trail Lite Evo GTX effectively waterproof and protects the interiors from debris. It also contributes to a secure fit.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Tongue: gusset type
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Both sides (full)

Heel tab

There are no pull tabs on the boot but it is rather easy to put on and take off.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Heel tab
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX None

Removable insole

The boot's insole is easily removable in case you need to use custom orthotics or any other insoles.

Zamberlan 320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Removable insole
Test results
320 Trail Lite Evo GTX Yes